From: Hal Daume III <hdaume@ISI.EDU>
To: Caml Mailing List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: [Caml-list] unboxing of unary datatypes
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:08:32 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0301131605250.27265-100000@moussor.isi.edu> (raw)
Hi all,
I originally had a very calculation intensive program which used a data
type which looked like:
> type foo = Foo of float
I could just have easily used floats, but I wanted to ensure that I didn't
do anything stupid (like try to multiply a foo by a float), so I did this
boxing so the type-checker would help me out.
I had always assumed that once the code got past the typechecker, the
ocaml compiler would optimize away the constructor, so that the resulting
code would be as efficient as if I had just done
> type foo = float
But based on some non-scientific tests, it seems that this isn't the case,
and that the original foo type is actually represented using a
pointer-to-float.
I cannot imagine why this is the case (coming from a Haskell world, there
is a difference there between these two types due to laziness, but since
ocaml is strict, I figured this wouldn't be the case).
Can someone explain this to me? Why doesn't the compiler optimize out the
constructor?
- Hal
--
Hal Daume III
"Computer science is no more about computers | hdaume@isi.edu
than astronomy is about telescopes." -Dijkstra | www.isi.edu/~hdaume
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next reply other threads:[~2003-01-14 0:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-14 0:08 Hal Daume III [this message]
2003-01-14 4:38 ` Nicolas Cannasse
2003-01-14 11:17 ` Florian Hars
2003-01-14 15:15 ` Nicolas Cannasse
2003-01-14 9:57 ` Fabrice Le Fessant
2003-01-14 11:19 ` Christophe Raffalli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.GSO.4.21.0301131605250.27265-100000@moussor.isi.edu \
--to=hdaume@isi.edu \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).