From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id QAA00611; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 16:10:22 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA00805 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 16:10:21 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from nitro.isi.edu (nitro.isi.edu [128.9.208.207]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h3TEAJH28042 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 16:10:19 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from moussor.isi.edu (moussor.isi.edu [128.9.208.41]) by nitro.isi.edu (8.11.6p2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id h3TEA2v02032; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 07:10:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (hdaume@localhost) by moussor.isi.edu (8.9.3/8.8.6) with ESMTP id HAA25138; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 07:10:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: moussor.isi.edu: hdaume owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 07:10:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Hal Daume III To: Markus Mottl cc: OCaml List Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Looking for a real array In-Reply-To: <20030429105243.GA30024@fichte.ai.univie.ac.at> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 unboxed:01 infer:01 foo:01 arrays:01 compiler:01 bigarray:01 float:02 compile:02 module:03 abstract:03 array:04 type:07 defined:07 iii:90 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk > to use the Bigarray module unless you need very large arrays. Normal > float arrays, too, are unboxed, but only when the compiler can infer at > compile time that they are guaranteed to be float arrays. Does this also apply if I have an abstract type defined in another module: > type foo = float and then have a foo array? - Hal ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners