From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id JAA05692; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:53:49 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA03067 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:53:47 +0100 (MET) Received: from nef.ens.fr (nef.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g0G8rl516027 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:53:47 +0100 (MET) Received: from clipper.ens.fr (clipper-gw.ens.fr [129.199.1.22]) by nef.ens.fr (8.10.1/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id g0G8rhe12671 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:53:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (douet@localhost) by clipper.ens.fr (8.9.2/jb-1.1) id JAA04114 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:53:43 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:53:43 +0100 (MET) From: Florian Douetteau Reply-To: FD To: ocaml Subject: Re: [Caml-list] error opening large file In-Reply-To: <20020115105612.A4497@pauillac.inria.fr> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk > > Now that I think I've figured it out, I plan to compile future > versions of OCaml in 64-bit-file-size mode, and add new library functions > to manipulate file positions and sizes as 64-bit integers (seek_in64, > Unix.stat64, etc). Would it degrade arithmetic performance a lot if 'int' conformed to 64-bit arithmetic on all platforms ? (on a 32-bit cpu, small integers would be unboxed, big integers would be boxed) -- Florian Douetteau ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr