From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id AAA04014; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 00:55:03 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA03807 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 00:55:03 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from hirsch.in-berlin.de (hirsch.in-berlin.de [192.109.42.6]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g3NMt2v15339 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 00:55:02 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from hirsch.in-berlin.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hirsch.in-berlin.de (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -2) with ESMTP id g3NMt1sP007782 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 00:55:02 +0200 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by hirsch.in-berlin.de (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -2) with UUCP id g3NMt1hg007773 for caml-list@inria.fr; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 00:55:01 +0200 X-Envelope-From: oliver@first.in-berlin.de X-Envelope-To: caml-list@inria.fr Received: from localhost (oliver@localhost) by first.in-berlin.de (8.7.6/8.7.3) with SMTP id AAA00156 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 00:50:34 +0200 Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 00:50:34 +0200 (MET DST) From: Oliver Bandel To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Stack Overflow... (recursion in try-statement) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hi, I have found a working version: On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Oliver Bandel wrote: > Hello, > > > why does an stack overflow-error occur here? > > let rec traversedir dir = > try ( [Unix.readdir dir] @ traversedir dir ) with > End_of_file -> [];; [...] It works with let rec traversedir dir = try ( traversedir dir @ [Unix.readdir dir] ) with End_of_file -> [];; ...but I have to add the recursive traversing-call (if Unix.st_kind is a S_DIR, I have to open that dir and go into it too... so I may add the opendir/closedir-calls into the traversedir itself...) But I'm wondering if I better should have a list as an addtional parameter, on which I append with readdir. Any design-hints are welcome. Ciao, Oliver ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners