From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id OAA12290; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 14:55:05 +0200 (MET DST)
X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f
Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA12164 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 14:55:04 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from hirsch.in-berlin.de (hirsch.in-berlin.de [192.109.42.6])
	by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g7MCt3X20686
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 14:55:03 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from hirsch.in-berlin.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by hirsch.in-berlin.de (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -2) with ESMTP id g7MCt2W0010041
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT);
	Thu, 22 Aug 2002 14:55:02 +0200
Received: (from uucp@localhost)
	by hirsch.in-berlin.de (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -2) with UUCP id g7MCt10U010039;
	Thu, 22 Aug 2002 14:55:01 +0200
X-Envelope-From: oliver@first.in-berlin.de
X-Envelope-To: caml-list@inria.fr
Received: from localhost (oliver@localhost) by first.in-berlin.de (8.7.6/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA00778; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 14:40:58 +0200
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 14:40:58 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Oliver Bandel <oliver@first.in-berlin.de>
To: Oleg <oleg_inconnu@myrealbox.com>
cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Calling a function with a self-defined type as argument
In-Reply-To: <200208220149.VAA14728@dewberry.cc.columbia.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.1020822143542.635A-100000@first.in-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Oleg wrote:

> On Wednesday 21 August 2002 09:11 pm, Oliver Bandel wrote:
> 
> 
> ... because
> 
> > (*
> >    let _ = x Line "h0oifdaji oi" ;;
> >    This last one does not work: => "This function is applied to too many
> > arguments"
> 
> x is applied to 2 arguments
> 
> >    let _ = x Line( "reuruhjf" ) ;;
> >    This last one does not work: => "This function is applied to too many
> > arguments"
> 
> still 2 (no difference whatsoever)

But the Line ("text")-argument is only complete as a Line(),
if Line() has a higher priority than the function-call.
I have *one* argument, which is complete if given EMPTY,
and complete if given Line ("argument").

Shouldn't be types have a higher priority than calls
in this case?
Is Line() in this example handled like an ordinary function?

That is, what I think that it is a littlebid crazy.
I use the type-definition to put things together
nad use them as one type, but then it is handled
like a puzzle, before it is put together.
But I want here a complete picture, and I thought
the compiler would put the parts together: How to
put them together is clear: I have said it him in the
type-declaration.

Ciao,
   Oliver

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners