From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id LAA07802; Thu, 31 May 2001 11:07:48 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id LAA07775 for caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr; Thu, 31 May 2001 11:07:47 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id DAA03188 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 03:02:02 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from earth.zigamorph.net (adsl-63-202-13-20.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.202.13.20]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f4V11vv15979 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 03:02:01 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost (awwaiid@localhost) by earth.zigamorph.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA15068; Thu, 31 May 2001 01:05:00 GMT From: rbw3@cet.nau.edu X-Authentication-Warning: earth.zigamorph.net: awwaiid owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 01:05:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender: awwaiid@earth.zigamorph.net To: Brian Rogoff cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] CDK license In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk If my understanding is correct, the CDK library being under GPL is different then what you think. All that means it that the tools that they use to put the library together are GPL, not that the software you develop with the CDK is GPL. A huge example of this is the GCC suite. --Brock On Wed, 30 May 2001, Brian Rogoff wrote: | I notice that the CDK license is GPL, rather than LGPL. I've read the ... | -- Brian ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr