From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id IAA08851; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 08:41:04 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA08718 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 08:41:02 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from staff.cs.usyd.edu.au (staff.cs.usyd.edu.au [129.78.8.1]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with SMTP id f5E6exj28976 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 08:41:00 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from hons.cs.usyd.edu.au. by staff.cs.usyd.edu.au.; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 16:40:54 +1000 Received: from localhost (mrak@localhost) by hons.cs.usyd.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA16867 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 16:40:53 +1000 X-Authentication-Warning: hons.cs.usyd.edu.au: mrak owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 16:40:53 +1000 (EST) From: Mark Wotton cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Caml toplevel and readline In-Reply-To: <3B2796C1.9144F7AE@ozemail.com.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, John Max Skaller wrote: > I find the ocaml top level 'ocaml' very clumbsy to use, compared with, > say, Python's top level, because it doesn't understand line editing. > Any chance of optionally building it with gnu_readline? This would be great. Really. mrak ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr