caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kontra, Gergely" <kgergely@mlabdial.hit.bme.hu>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Threats on future of Camlp4
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 13:34:39 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0210111314410.21652-100000@mlabdial.hit.bme.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021006235450.GB5700@kiefer.ai.univie.ac.at>

>I want to make my contribution to this flamewar short:
>
>  * Camlp4 is useful.

>Otherwise, please resolve personal issues over a beer in a bar or in a
>fight outside, whichever you prefer. As long as all of you stay healthy
>for further development, OCaml-users will be happy... ;-)

I agree, camlp4 IS useful. (Exploring the alternative syntax)
I just afraid of developing in ocaml, if there exists two version of the
syntax. Sorry to say, but I cannot say much clever about this issue, but
I think the main goal is to have ONE version of syntax, which is clean.
But I know many people used to the old syntax, so I really
don't know how to handle it. As a newbie to ocaml, I found, that the
alternative syntax helps us to write correct code (but to tell the truth
I don't agree with some of the decisions... Eg. it uses value, not val,
explaining ocaml syntax doesn't have abbreviated keywords. But it does
have! The fun keyword, which is not called function. Anyway, this is not
a bad thing, since SML use fun also, so I think one can have val, which
is exactly the same in SML.
Another thing, that
bothers me is the do { } syntax. It seems a bit silly mixture of some
shell and C syntax, I think either do ... done or { ... } would be a
good choice (or support both, this way bash and C programmers will be
happy ;))
Ok, I know, you'll say: "Then why don't you write your own syntax?"

Ooops, so I'd like to know what is the tendecy: will the alternative
syntax be a new standard, or users should use the old syntax, and the
alternative syntax supporting is their problem?

ps: If this was discussed, please tell me where can I read it.

Gergo

+-[Kontra, Gergely @ Budapest University of Technology and Economics]-+
|         Email: kgergely@mcl.hu,  kgergely@turul.eet.bme.hu          |
|  URL:   turul.eet.bme.hu/~kgergely    Mobile: (+36 20) 356 9656     |
+-------"Olyan langesz vagyok, hogy poroltoval kellene jarnom!"-------+
.
Magyar php mirror es magyar php dokumentacio: http://hu.php.net

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners


  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-10-11 11:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-06 18:55 Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 19:23 ` Chris Hecker
2002-10-06 19:52   ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 21:01   ` brogoff
2002-10-06 21:09     ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 19:29 ` Oleg
2002-10-06 20:01   ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 20:24     ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-10-06 20:24       ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
     [not found]         ` <200210062143.g96Lhix15834@orchestra.cs.caltech.edu>
2002-10-07  2:47           ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 20:28     ` Dave Mason
2002-10-06 20:50       ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 20:45     ` Oleg
2002-10-06 21:03       ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 21:46         ` Florian Douetteau
2002-10-07  2:56           ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-06 23:54     ` Markus Mottl
2002-10-07  9:06       ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-11 11:34       ` Kontra, Gergely [this message]
2002-10-11 12:56         ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-10-11 13:15         ` [Caml-list] Future " Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-12 21:45           ` Oleg
2002-10-13  9:02             ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-11 16:36         ` [Caml-list] Syntax brogoff
2002-10-07  7:21 ` [Caml-list] Threats on future of Camlp4 Sven LUTHER
2002-10-07  8:52   ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-07 11:25     ` Sven LUTHER
2002-10-07 11:30       ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-10-07 11:55         ` Sven LUTHER
2002-10-08  7:57     ` Alessandro Baretta
     [not found]       ` <nhalm59cf0s.fsf@malabar.mitre.org>
2002-10-08 14:05         ` Alessandro Baretta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.21.0210111314410.21652-100000@mlabdial.hit.bme.hu \
    --to=kgergely@mlabdial.hit.bme.hu \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).