From: Brian Hurt <brian.hurt@qlogic.com>
To: Xavier Leroy <xavier.leroy@inria.fr>
Cc: Oleg <oleg_inconnu@myrealbox.com>, <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Coyote Gulch test in Caml
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 09:57:10 -0600 (CST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0301210955240.2036-100000@eagle.ancor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030121105648.A5543@pauillac.inria.fr>
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Xavier Leroy wrote:
> Nickolay Semyonov-Kolchin asks:
>
> > But then this brings up the issue of conformity vr.s performance. For
> > example- the x86 has its 80-bit FP registers in 8087-legacy mode, but
> > 64-bit registers if you're using SSE2. And PowerPC and PA-RISC both have
> > extended precision fused multiply-adds (that keep higher precision, i.e.
> > don't round, between the multiply and the adds).
>
> > For that matter, could a
> > "conforming" implementation of Ocaml use the 32-bit single precision SSE-1
> > registers?
>
I think these were me. But thanks for answering them.
BTW, I'm willing to try out your code. I'm writting some numerical code
for Ocaml, and like all the optimization I can get :-).
Brian
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-21 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-03 16:00 [Caml-list] speed onlyclimb
2003-01-03 11:38 ` [Caml-list] speed Clemens Hintze
2003-01-03 11:47 ` [Caml-list] speed Noel Welsh
2003-01-02 16:45 ` Chet Murthy
2003-01-03 13:32 ` Xavier Leroy
2003-01-02 17:52 ` Chet Murthy
2003-01-03 14:53 ` Sven Luther
2003-01-03 15:28 ` Erol Akarsu
2003-01-02 17:53 ` Coyote Gulch test in Caml (was Re: [Caml-list] speed ) Chet Murthy
2003-01-03 15:10 ` Shawn Wagner
2003-01-03 15:56 ` Oleg
2003-01-04 18:31 ` Xavier Leroy
2003-01-18 22:49 ` Oleg
2003-01-18 23:50 ` Shawn Wagner
2003-01-20 21:23 ` David Chase
2003-01-20 21:39 ` Nickolay Semyonov-Kolchin
2003-01-21 0:54 ` Brian Hurt
2003-01-21 13:09 ` David Chase
2003-01-21 13:15 ` Daniel Andor
2003-01-21 20:26 ` Nickolay Semyonov-Kolchin
2003-01-19 10:33 ` Siegfried Gonzi
2003-01-19 10:34 ` Siegfried Gonzi
2003-01-21 9:56 ` [Caml-list] Re: Coyote Gulch test in Caml Xavier Leroy
2003-01-21 15:57 ` Brian Hurt [this message]
2003-01-27 16:58 ` Daniel Andor
2003-01-28 8:27 ` Christian Lindig
2003-01-05 1:13 ` [Caml-list] speed Brian Hurt
2003-01-05 1:48 ` Michael Vanier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.33.0301210955240.2036-100000@eagle.ancor.com \
--to=brian.hurt@qlogic.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=oleg_inconnu@myrealbox.com \
--cc=xavier.leroy@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).