From: Brian Hurt <brian.hurt@qlogic.com>
To: Oliver Bandel <oliver@first.in-berlin.de>
Cc: <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [oliver: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml popularity]
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:20:07 -0600 (CST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0303131011510.2164-100000@eagle.ancor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030313003522.GB1261@first.in-berlin.de>
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Oliver Bandel wrote:
[ RE: enterprise apps ]
> Well, when reasoning about data-structures, OCaml could provide
> much here.
> But IMHO, this area is absolutely a high-performance field.
>
> And when you retrieve a lot of data, then every little
> performance lack (which is not worth talking about, the little
> quantity of some thousands of datasets or so) will
> cause long waiting times for the application and the user...
I know a couple of people who work in this field, and from their
experiences the #1 with a bullet delay is the database. They spend a lot
of time optimizing their queries and table structures (where you put
indexes, etc). And no time what so ever optimizing their code, because it
just doesn't matter. If the DB query is going to take 15 minutes, it's
not going to matter much if the code firing off the query takes 1ms or
100ms. In code, they look for ease of development and maintainance more
so than performance.
Which is why Java took off *despite* it's earlier (and, to a certain
extent, continuing) performance problems.
> So you have to use C/C++ for the next decade there, IMHO. (But I hope
> that there are some niches, where OCaml could be used here too.)
Java is huge, but PowerBuilder (still), VisualBasic, and Perl all have
signifigant market shares.
Brian
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-13 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-13 0:35 Oliver Bandel
2003-03-13 16:20 ` Brian Hurt [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-13 14:39 Oliver Bandel
2003-03-13 0:34 Oliver Bandel
2003-03-12 23:53 Oliver Bandel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.33.0303131011510.2164-100000@eagle.ancor.com \
--to=brian.hurt@qlogic.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=oliver@first.in-berlin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).