From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id TAA28192; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 19:40:32 +0200 (MET DST)
X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f
Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA27268 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 19:40:31 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from epexch01.qlogic.org ([63.170.40.3])
	by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h3SHeUH12653
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 19:40:30 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from epmailtmp.qlogic.org ([10.20.33.254]) by epexch01.qlogic.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329);
	 Mon, 28 Apr 2003 12:39:46 -0500
Received: from [10.20.33.146] ([10.20.33.146]) by epmailtmp.qlogic.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.4905);
	 Mon, 28 Apr 2003 12:39:46 -0500
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 12:48:43 -0500 (CDT)
From: Brian Hurt <brian.hurt@qlogic.com>
X-X-Sender:  <brianh@eagle.ancor.com>
Reply-To: Brian Hurt <brian.hurt@qlogic.com>
To: <brogoff@speakeasy.net>
cc: "caml-list@inria.fr" <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Easy solution in OCaml?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0304280854190.19040-100000@grace.speakeasy.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0304281248260.3160-100000@eagle.ancor.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Apr 2003 17:39:46.0251 (UTC) FILETIME=[28DBE9B0:01C30DAD]
X-Spam: no; 0.00; qlogic:01 caml-list:01 brogoff:01 gouy:01 expr:01 ocaml:01 speakeasy:01 mottl:02 wrote:03 markus:04 functional:06 complaining:06 brian:06 programming:07 isaac:08 
Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 28 Apr 2003 brogoff@speakeasy.net wrote:

> On Mon, 28 Apr 2003, isaac gouy wrote:
> > Markus Mottl wrote:
> > > I actually find it strange that there is no such 
> > > thing like if-then-else in Clean.
> > 
> > if-then-else is described on p35 of "Functional
> > Programming in Clean". 
> 
> But it is not "if <expr> then <expr> else <expr>", it is 
> "if <expr> <expr> <expr>" which is what people are complaining 
> about when they say there is no if-then-else in Clean. 
> 

They're complaining about 2 extra keywords?

Brian


-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners