From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id JAA16368; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 09:30:10 +0200 (MET DST)
X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f
Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA16260 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 09:30:09 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from comtv.ru (comtv.ru [217.10.32.4])
	by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g8B7U6925982
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 09:30:09 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from [10.0.66.9] ([10.0.66.9] verified)
  by comtv.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.9)
  with ESMTP-TLS id 4438692; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 11:30:05 +0400
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 11:30:07 +0400 (MSD)
From: malc <malc@pulsesoft.com>
X-X-Sender: malc@home.oyster.ru
To: Chris Hecker <checker@d6.com>
cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] eval order and 'and'
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20020910181738.045329a0@mail.d6.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209111128290.878-100000@home.oyster.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Chris Hecker wrote:

> Does "let a and b in" guarantee a is evaluated before b, like "let a in let 
> b in" does?
> 
> Chris
> 
> PS.  I don't think this is a FAQ, but it's basically impossible to 
> construct a search that finds this specific question, so who knows!  ;)

<quote>