From: malc <malc@pulsesoft.com>
To: Brian Hurt <bhurt@spnz.org>
Cc: Ocaml Mailing List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Object-oriented access bottleneck
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 01:30:08 +0300 (MSK) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0312090128490.1828@home.oyster.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312081514270.5009-101000@localhost.localdomain>
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Brian Hurt wrote:
> Attached is some microbenchmarking code I just whomped together. It gives
> both C and Ocaml timings on tight loops of functions calls. The results:
>
> My conclusions:
>
> - Despite my best efforts, ocaml inlined (and removed) the call to foo.
> In general this is good, but it did defeat my efforts to time how long a
> direct function call took. For some reason it didn't also eliminate the
> for loops. If I had to guess, Ocaml's call to a known function is about
> the same speed as C's.
Make foo recursive (as in 'let rec foo' vs 'let foo'), OCaml will not
inline it.
--
mailto:malc@pulsesoft.com
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-08 22:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-07 2:39 Nuutti Kotivuori
2003-12-07 2:59 ` Nicolas Cannasse
2003-12-07 11:22 ` Benjamin Geer
2003-12-07 14:12 ` Nicolas Cannasse
2003-12-07 18:04 ` Nuutti Kotivuori
2003-12-07 10:27 ` Jacques Garrigue
2003-12-07 19:46 ` Nuutti Kotivuori
2003-12-08 1:07 ` Jacques Garrigue
2003-12-08 15:08 ` Nuutti Kotivuori
2003-12-08 15:42 ` Richard Jones
2003-12-09 0:26 ` Nicolas Cannasse
2003-12-09 12:10 ` Nuutti Kotivuori
2003-12-09 13:17 ` Olivier Andrieu
2003-12-09 13:53 ` Nuutti Kotivuori
2003-12-08 17:51 ` Brian Hurt
2003-12-08 18:19 ` brogoff
2003-12-08 20:09 ` Brian Hurt
2003-12-08 19:02 ` Xavier Leroy
2003-12-08 21:37 ` Brian Hurt
2003-12-08 21:06 ` Nuutti Kotivuori
2003-12-08 22:30 ` malc [this message]
2003-12-07 18:23 ` Brian Hurt
2003-12-07 18:14 ` Nuutti Kotivuori
2003-12-07 19:30 ` Brian Hurt
2003-12-07 23:50 ` Abdulaziz Ghuloum
2003-12-08 17:29 ` Brian Hurt
2003-12-08 18:48 ` Nuutti Kotivuori
2003-12-08 10:17 ` Nuutti Kotivuori
2003-12-08 19:51 ` skaller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.55.0312090128490.1828@home.oyster.ru \
--to=malc@pulsesoft.com \
--cc=bhurt@spnz.org \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).