From: brogoff <brogoff@speakeasy.net>
To: james woodyatt <jhw@wetware.com>
Cc: Ocaml Trade <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] kaplan-okasaki-tarjan deque (was "looping recursion")
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:20:51 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0407301412180.31375@shell2.speakeasy.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E6358338-E255-11D8-995D-000A958FF2FE@wetware.com>
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004, james woodyatt wrote:
> On 30 Jul 2004, at 10:07, brogoff wrote:
> >
> > I would like to see an implementation of the catenable deques only
> > using simple list ops (not laziness) described by Kaplan and Tarjan,
> > in OCaml.
>
> Sure. Here is the basic implementation I did for performance
> comparisons.
Thanks. I emailed you back a version with the magic gone, using the recursive
module extension to bulldozer over your abuse of the type system ;-). It's the
least offensive (IMO of course) of the current workarounds. I wonder if the
implementors can tell us if there is any hope that we'll see some better
solutions in the near future?
BTW, what did your comparisons tell you?
-- Brian
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-30 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-27 23:43 [Caml-list] looping recursion briand
2004-07-28 0:27 ` John Prevost
2004-07-28 0:38 ` John Prevost
2004-07-28 1:17 ` skaller
2004-07-28 1:05 ` briand
2004-07-28 1:43 ` Brian Hurt
2004-07-28 2:49 ` briand
2004-07-28 3:12 ` Brian Hurt
2004-07-28 3:20 ` Brian Hurt
2004-07-28 5:54 ` brogoff
2004-07-28 7:22 ` Alex Baretta
2004-07-28 16:38 ` brogoff
2004-07-28 19:40 ` Jon Harrop
2004-07-28 20:18 ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-07-29 6:01 ` Alex Baretta
2004-07-28 21:22 ` brogoff
2004-07-29 9:13 ` Daniel Andor
2004-07-29 9:25 ` Keith Wansbrough
2004-07-29 9:41 ` Nicolas Cannasse
2004-07-29 9:57 ` Xavier Leroy
2004-07-29 10:44 ` Daniel Andor
2004-07-29 12:56 ` brogoff
2004-07-29 10:11 ` skaller
2004-07-29 12:41 ` brogoff
2004-07-29 6:28 ` Alex Baretta
2004-07-29 14:58 ` brogoff
2004-07-29 16:12 ` Brian Hurt
2004-07-29 17:49 ` james woodyatt
2004-07-29 19:25 ` Brian Hurt
2004-07-29 20:01 ` brogoff
2004-07-30 4:42 ` james woodyatt
2004-07-29 17:44 ` james woodyatt
2004-07-29 23:12 ` skaller
2004-07-29 22:42 ` Alex Baretta
2004-07-30 2:38 ` Corey O'Connor
[not found] ` <200407300136.14042.jon@jdh30.plus.com>
2004-07-30 12:45 ` Alex Baretta
2004-07-30 17:07 ` brogoff
2004-07-30 18:25 ` [Caml-list] kaplan-okasaki-tarjan deque (was "looping recursion") james woodyatt
2004-07-30 21:20 ` brogoff [this message]
2004-07-31 5:37 ` james woodyatt
2004-07-28 7:27 ` [Caml-list] looping recursion skaller
2004-07-28 14:36 ` Brian Hurt
2004-07-28 22:05 ` skaller
2004-07-28 0:37 ` skaller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.58.0407301412180.31375@shell2.speakeasy.net \
--to=brogoff@speakeasy.net \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=jhw@wetware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).