From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 960F9BC75 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:59:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j1MBx4KC008856 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:59:04 +0100 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA05972 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:59:03 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail.physik.uni-muenchen.de (mail.physik.uni-muenchen.de [192.54.42.129]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j1MBx3ow008852 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:59:03 +0100 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mail.physik.uni-muenchen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07922000B; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:59:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.physik.uni-muenchen.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.physik.uni-muenchen.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 00510-02-29; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:59:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailhost.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de (kaiser.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de [141.84.136.1]) by mail.physik.uni-muenchen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D1CE20008; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:59:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from eiger.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de (eiger.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de [141.84.136.54]) by mailhost.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F7926E87; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:59:01 +0100 (CET) Received: by eiger.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de (Postfix, from userid 3092) id 18C693D98; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:59:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eiger.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 158162D713; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:59:01 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:59:01 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Fischbacher To: Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Persistence In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: X-BOFH: Daemons did it MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at physik.uni-muenchen.de X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 421B1E88.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 421B1E87.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 pons:01 wrote:01 low-level:01 winning:98 cip:98 cip:98 lambda:01 lambda:01 imperative:01 debian:02 functional:02 physik:02 physik:02 gnu:03 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons wrote: > Winning against a mixed imperative/functional implementation in e.g. > C/C++ require a lot of low-level implementation work - and you will > end anyway implementing some kind of 'functional core'. Greenspun's tenth rule, isn't it? -- regards, tf@cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de (o_ Thomas Fischbacher - http://www.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~tf //\ (lambda (n) ((lambda (p q r) (p p q r)) (lambda (g x y) V_/_ (if (= x 0) y (g g (- x 1) (* x y)))) n 1)) (Debian GNU)