From: brogoff <brogoff@speakeasy.net>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] About the O'Reilly book on the web
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 16:12:40 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0611301602520.28364@shell3.speakeasy.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200611292120.16437.jon@ffconsultancy.com>
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Jon Harrop wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 November 2006 17:25, brogoff wrote:
> > questions about the future of CamlP4
>
> I thought the upcoming, revamped camlp4 was one of the hotly anticipated new
> features scheduled for OCaml 4?
It's for OCaml 3.10, as mentioned, and while I look forward to it, the
fact that it is still a second class tool (compare to ocamldoc, ocamldebug,
or even ocamllex/ocamlyacc) causes me to view it a bit suspiciously. By
"second class" I don't mean to impugn the quality of the tool here.
OCaml is not mainstream, and I'm reluctant to make it even less so where
I work by using an alternative syntax enabled by a second class tool.
-- Brian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-01 0:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-25 18:38 Francois Colonna
2006-11-27 9:07 ` [Caml-list] " Sebastien Ferre
2006-11-28 21:01 ` Philippe Wang
2006-11-28 22:33 ` Till Varoquaux
2006-11-28 22:47 ` Martin Jambon
2006-11-29 0:18 ` Philippe Wang
2006-11-29 1:48 ` Martin Jambon
2006-11-29 15:26 ` Philippe Wang
2006-11-29 17:52 ` Diego Olivier FERNANDEZ PONS
2006-11-29 17:25 ` brogoff
2006-11-29 18:10 ` Philippe Wang
2006-11-30 2:30 ` skaller
2006-11-30 18:20 ` Tom
2006-12-01 3:21 ` skaller
2006-12-01 6:48 ` Tom
2006-11-29 21:20 ` Jon Harrop
2006-11-29 21:25 ` Till Varoquaux
2006-12-01 0:12 ` brogoff [this message]
2006-11-28 23:07 ` Philippe Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.58.0611301602520.28364@shell3.speakeasy.net \
--to=brogoff@speakeasy.net \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).