From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 560A7BC28 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 15:29:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iALETi4O001776 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 15:29:45 +0100 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA32540 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 15:29:44 +0100 (MET) Received: from comtv.ru (mail.comtv.ru [217.10.32.17]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iALETh4L032348 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 15:29:44 +0100 Received: from av1474.oops ([10.0.66.9] verified) by comtv.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 45818438; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 17:29:42 +0300 Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 17:30:16 +0300 (MSK) From: malc X-X-Sender: malc@home.oyster.ru To: Vincenzo Ciancia Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] The madness of ignoring people In-Reply-To: <200411211514.58208.vincenzo_mlRE.MOVE@yahoo.it> Message-ID: References: <200411202343.22273.vincenzo_mlRE.MOVE@yahoo.it> <1101041482.22082.34.camel@pelican.wigram> <200411211514.58208.vincenzo_mlRE.MOVE@yahoo.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 41A0A658.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 41A0A657.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; malc:01 malc:01 pulsesoft:01 caml-list:01 wrote:01 wrote:01 compiler:01 ocaml:01 pulsesoft:01 dynamic:03 dynamic:03 loading:04 loading:04 problem:05 ignoring:05 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (2004-09-13) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=disabled version=3.0.0 X-Spam-Level: On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote: > On Sunday 21 November 2004 13:51, skaller wrote: >> They're not ignoring contributions, they're being >> selective as they must be. > > I see that I was wrong, I misunderstood malc's post. I can't bear when I > see people which are actually "ignored" in the sense that they post > interesting work and they don't get any reply, but this is not the case > - obviously nobody is required to integrate any possible patch in the > mainstream compiler (even if, to speak about this precise case, dynamic > loading of C code is a very interesting feature). Sorry, but you are wrong again, this particular case is about dynamic loading of OCaml code, for C code there isn't and never was any problem. -- mailto:malc@pulsesoft.com