From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2C80BC32 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:05:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j2FI5DeI028819 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:05:13 +0100 Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA18680 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:05:13 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail.physik.uni-muenchen.de (mail.physik.uni-muenchen.de [192.54.42.129]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j2FI5CR9012330 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:05:12 +0100 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mail.physik.uni-muenchen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A8C720026; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:05:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.physik.uni-muenchen.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.physik.uni-muenchen.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 08613-01-43; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:05:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailhost.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de (kaiser.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de [141.84.136.1]) by mail.physik.uni-muenchen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AE0520021; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:05:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from eiger.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de (eiger.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de [141.84.136.54]) by mailhost.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A57226E89; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:05:10 +0100 (CET) Received: by eiger.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de (Postfix, from userid 3092) id 10D7E1E4B9; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:05:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eiger.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB01F2C1; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:05:10 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:05:10 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Fischbacher To: Christophe TROESTLER Cc: "O'Caml Mailing List" Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml troll on Slashdot In-Reply-To: <20050315.162501.15509039.debian00@tiscali.be> Message-ID: References: <20050315092502.GA19351@furbychan.cocan.org> <1093.80.8.1.44.1110882854.squirrel@mail.irisa.fr> <20050315.091248.68545374.eijiro_sumii@anet.ne.jp> <20050315.162501.15509039.debian00@tiscali.be> X-BOFH: Daemons did it MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at physik.uni-muenchen.de X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 423723D9.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 423723D8.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 ocaml:01 christophe:01 troestler:01 ocaml:01 ...:98 cip:98 cip:98 lambda:01 lambda:01 wrote:01 debian:02 physik:02 physik:02 gnu:03 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Christophe TROESTLER wrote: > I agree with that. The ./ post is a typical > I-don't-know-what-I-am-talking-about-so-I-say-it-loud ! If he made a > point I believe it is that it's easier to hit the "send" key than to > try to be a good programmer... Isn't it sad that those people generate so much more noise than those who know how to program and really do cool stuff with ocaml? -- regards, tf@cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de (o_ Thomas Fischbacher - http://www.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~tf //\ (lambda (n) ((lambda (p q r) (p p q r)) (lambda (g x y) V_/_ (if (= x 0) y (g g (- x 1) (* x y)))) n 1)) (Debian GNU)