From: Thomas Fischbacher <Thomas.Fischbacher@Physik.Uni-Muenchen.DE>
To: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Cc: Yaron Minsky <yminsky@cs.cornell.edu>, caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Ray tracer language comparison
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 20:07:30 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0510092005550.29868@eiger.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877jcmbnha.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
On Sun, 9 Oct 2005, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Thomas Fischbacher:
>
> > I just extended my analysis by another implementation in yet another
> > language. This time, it's "Steel Bank Common Lisp".
>
> Is this some kind of elaborate hoax? If it is, I don't get it?
>
> "OCaml" vs. "Objective Caml", "SBCL" vs. "Steel Bank Common Lisp",
> "1/8" vs. "1/10" -- all these comparisons are a bit strange.
All the numbers and measurements on my page are for real. As well as all
statements concerning my testing environment. And I am using precisely the
same diligence with my studies as Jon does with his.
--
regards, tf@cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de (o_
Thomas Fischbacher - http://www.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~tf //\
(lambda (n) ((lambda (p q r) (p p q r)) (lambda (g x y) V_/_
(if (= x 0) y (g g (- x 1) (* x y)))) n 1)) (Debian GNU)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-09 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-03 23:18 Jon Harrop
2005-10-04 13:49 ` [Caml-list] " Thomas Fischbacher
2005-10-09 5:26 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2005-10-09 11:24 ` Yaron Minsky
2005-10-09 13:59 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2005-10-09 17:37 ` Florian Weimer
2005-10-09 18:07 ` Thomas Fischbacher [this message]
2005-10-09 14:53 ` Vincenzo Ciancia
2005-10-09 10:19 ` [Caml-list] " Gerd Stolpmann
2005-10-09 11:26 ` sejourne_kevin
2005-10-09 14:58 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2005-10-09 17:25 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2005-10-09 14:38 yoann padioleau
2005-10-09 16:00 ` Chris Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.61.0510092005550.29868@eiger.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de \
--to=thomas.fischbacher@physik.uni-muenchen.de \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
--cc=fw@deneb.enyo.de \
--cc=yminsky@cs.cornell.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).