From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5DA6BB9A for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:23:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jA7CN5Bw022403 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:23:06 +0100 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA04518 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:23:05 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail.physik.uni-muenchen.de (mail.physik.uni-muenchen.de [192.54.42.129]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jA7CN49i019022 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:23:05 +0100 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mail.physik.uni-muenchen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554CD2000A; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:23:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.physik.uni-muenchen.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.physik.uni-muenchen.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 13359-01-11; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:23:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailhost.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de (kaiser.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de [141.84.136.1]) by mail.physik.uni-muenchen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C4A20007; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:23:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from eiger.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de (eiger.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de [141.84.136.54]) by mailhost.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E64F726E89; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:22:54 +0100 (CET) Received: by eiger.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de (Postfix, from userid 3092) id EC94C34FFF; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:23:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eiger.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E19BF220C7; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:23:00 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:23:00 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Fischbacher To: Tony Edgin Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Wikipedia In-Reply-To: <001601c5e366$c21fcb00$6832b8cb@Mark> Message-ID: References: <001601c5e366$c21fcb00$6832b8cb@Mark> X-BOFH: Daemons did it MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at physik.uni-muenchen.de X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 436F4729.002 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 436F4728.002 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 ocaml:01 arises:01 2005,:98 cip:98 cip:98 lambda:01 lambda:01 wrote:01 supported:01 referenced:01 caml:02 debian:02 physik:02 physik:02 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Tony Edgin wrote: > I really don't see the issue here. Yep. He posted several examples hosted > on his own server and referenced his own book. It would have been > significantly more work for him to dig up and test links to examples he > didn't produce. If more people would contribute, the diversity of websites > reference would increase, and the density of FFConsultancy links would > decrease. Actually, this would mean to turn this into a 100+ KB article on OCaml. The question arises whether this is appropriate for a brief overview in an encyclopedia. Maybe it would be much more appropriate to reference just one page that shows example applications, which furthermore is supported and maintained by INRIA, such as http://caml.inria.fr/about/successes.en.html -- regards, tf@cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de (o_ Thomas Fischbacher - http://www.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~tf //\ (lambda (n) ((lambda (p q r) (p p q r)) (lambda (g x y) V_/_ (if (= x 0) y (g g (- x 1) (* x y)))) n 1)) (Debian GNU)