From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B350BB9A for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:03:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jA7D3899029402 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:03:08 +0100 Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA05199 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:03:08 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail.physik.uni-muenchen.de (mail.physik.uni-muenchen.de [192.54.42.129]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jA7D37P1029395 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:03:08 +0100 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mail.physik.uni-muenchen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C1F2000A; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:03:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.physik.uni-muenchen.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.physik.uni-muenchen.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 09526-01-45; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:03:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailhost.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de (kaiser.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de [141.84.136.1]) by mail.physik.uni-muenchen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A3EE20007; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:03:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from eiger.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de (eiger.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de [141.84.136.54]) by mailhost.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C971326E89; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:02:57 +0100 (CET) Received: by eiger.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de (Postfix, from userid 3092) id D24CA34FFF; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:03:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eiger.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C741A220C7; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:03:03 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:03:03 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Fischbacher To: skaller Cc: caml-list@inria.fr, Tony Edgin Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Wikipedia In-Reply-To: <1131368133.1785.112.camel@rosella> Message-ID: References: <001601c5e366$c21fcb00$6832b8cb@Mark> <1131368133.1785.112.camel@rosella> X-BOFH: Daemons did it MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at physik.uni-muenchen.de X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 436F508C.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 436F508B.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 ocaml:01 variants:01 ocaml:01 2005,:98 cip:98 cip:98 lambda:01 lambda:01 wrote:01 polymorphic:01 imho:01 jacques:01 debian:02 physik:02 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, skaller wrote: > My point is -- more popular languages already pollute the > Wikipedia with considerable crap, so a well written > description of properties of Ocaml is warranted to > counter this rubbish -- 100KB if necessary!. IMHO. > > But not necessarily all in one place. > > For example I would love if Jacques Garrigue would > spindle, fold, and mutilate some of his notes > on Polymorphic Variants, make a separate article > on that, and hang a link off the main Ocaml article. Yes, I fully agree with you. -- regards, tf@cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de (o_ Thomas Fischbacher - http://www.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~tf //\ (lambda (n) ((lambda (p q r) (p p q r)) (lambda (g x y) V_/_ (if (= x 0) y (g g (- x 1) (* x y)))) n 1)) (Debian GNU)