caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Hurt <bhurt@spnz.org>
To: caml-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Efficiency of let/and
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 08:31:55 -0500 (CDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0509250826470.9226@localhost.localdomain> (raw)


Say I have two variables I want to set- variable a to the value expr1 and 
variable b to the value expr2.  The two expressions are pure (no side 
effects), and neither one depends upon the other (neither expr1 nor expr2 
contain either a or b as a value), so they can be evaluated in either 
order or in parallel with no harm.  With expressions like these, I've 
gotten into the habit of using let/and to express the parallelism, that is 
I go:

 	let a = expr1
 	and b = expr2
 	in
 	...

rather than:
 	let a = expr1 in
 	let b = expr2 in

So my question is: is there any value (other than the documentation value) 
in doing this?

Just wondering.

Brian


             reply	other threads:[~2005-09-25 13:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-25 13:31 Brian Hurt [this message]
2005-09-25 14:47 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2005-09-26  4:32 ` Ant: " Martin Chabr
2005-09-26  5:24   ` Fernando Alegre
2005-09-26  5:56   ` William Lovas
2005-09-26  7:17     ` Bill Wood
2005-09-26 20:59     ` Ant: " Martin Chabr
2005-09-26 13:22   ` Brian Hurt
2005-09-26 16:05     ` Ant: " Stefan Monnier
2005-09-26 16:30       ` [Caml-list] " Brian Hurt
2005-09-27  5:52         ` skaller
2005-09-27 13:06           ` Brian Hurt
2005-09-27 13:24             ` Alan Falloon
2005-09-27 15:24             ` Stefan Monnier
2005-09-27 16:11               ` Brian Hurt
2005-09-27  5:32       ` skaller
2005-09-27 15:21         ` Stefan Monnier
2005-09-26 17:04     ` Ant: [Caml-list] " Mackenzie Straight
2005-09-26 17:05   ` Marius Nita
2005-09-26 17:36     ` David McClain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.63.0509250826470.9226@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=bhurt@spnz.org \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).