caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Hurt <bhurt@spnz.org>
To: "Daniel Bünzli" <daniel.buenzli@epfl.ch>
Cc: caml-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: Ant:  [Caml-list] The "Objective" part of Objective Caml
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:02:44 -0600 (CST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0511080859590.20621@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E65C7A10-3F0D-4664-A207-290BF20FB36C@epfl.ch>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 719 bytes --]



On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Daniel Bünzli wrote:

>
> Le 8 nov. 05 à 03:15, Brian Hurt a écrit :
>
>> So patterns like singletons are hard to implement with Ocaml objects.
>
> Don't you have immediate objects [1] to do singletons ?

No- because immediate objects still allocate a new object every time they 
are evaluated.  I suppose you could do:

let factory =
     let myobject = new myclass in
     fun () -> myobject
;;

and do a factory method, but there is no way (that I know of) to prevent 
someone else from doing:
     let myotherobject = new myclass
and allocating a different object of the same class.

No, the proper way to do singletons in Ocaml is with modules, not objects.

Brian

  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-08 14:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-04 22:45 Florian Weimer
2005-11-07 21:41 ` Ant: [Caml-list] " Martin Chabr
2005-11-07 21:55   ` Florian Weimer
2005-11-08  1:47     ` skaller
2005-11-08  2:15       ` Brian Hurt
2005-11-08  7:15         ` Daniel Bünzli
2005-11-08 15:02           ` Brian Hurt [this message]
2005-11-08 15:39             ` Alexander Fuchs
2005-11-08 15:42             ` Matt Gushee
2005-11-08 15:56               ` Michael Wohlwend
2005-11-08 18:16         ` brogoff
2005-11-08 22:04           ` Brian Hurt
2005-11-08 23:40             ` brogoff
2005-11-09  9:00             ` skaller
2005-11-11 15:28       ` Florian Weimer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.63.0511080859590.20621@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=bhurt@spnz.org \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=daniel.buenzli@epfl.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).