From: malc <av1474@comtv.ru>
To: Brian Hurt <bhurt@spnz.org>
Cc: caml-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Today's inflamatory opinion: exceptions are bad
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:36:06 +0300 (MSK) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612100933550.545@home.oyster.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612100925060.545@home.oyster.ru>
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006, malc wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Dec 2006, Brian Hurt wrote:
>
>>
>> I think I've come to the conclusion that exceptions are bad.
>>
>> In Ocaml, they're useless in many cases, and in most cases wrong. Avoiding
>> them generally makes for better code. There are two vague types of
>> exceptions- those the program can, and probably should- handle, and those
>> that the program can't, and probably should even try to, handle.
>>
[..snip..]
And also there is `new' and, to the best of my knowlege, it's not
possible to return a `class option' should one want to dwelve into
O of Caml.
--
vale
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-10 6:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-10 1:42 Brian Hurt
2006-12-10 2:40 ` [Caml-list] " skaller
2006-12-10 2:51 ` Martin Jambon
2006-12-10 3:35 ` Chris King
2006-12-10 6:32 ` Jon Harrop
2006-12-10 19:07 ` brogoff
2006-12-10 18:04 ` Richard Jones
2006-12-10 23:27 ` Chris King
2006-12-11 15:55 ` Richard Jones
2006-12-15 11:13 ` Frédéric Gava
2006-12-11 17:28 ` Mike Lin
2006-12-11 20:09 ` Richard Jones
2006-12-11 23:38 ` Olivier Andrieu
[not found] ` <C841DA73-83D4-4CDD-BF4A-EA803C6D6A08@vub.ac.be>
2006-12-23 4:23 ` Ocaml checked exceptions Chris King
2006-12-10 6:30 ` [Caml-list] Today's inflamatory opinion: exceptions are bad malc
2006-12-10 6:36 ` malc [this message]
2006-12-10 6:56 ` Jon Harrop
2006-12-10 9:51 ` Andreas Rossberg
2006-12-10 11:00 ` Tom
2006-12-10 11:25 ` Andreas Rossberg
2006-12-10 13:27 ` Jean-Christophe Filliatre
2006-12-10 19:15 ` Haoyang Wang
2006-12-10 21:43 ` Jean-Christophe Filliatre
2006-12-11 13:10 ` Diego Olivier FERNANDEZ PONS
2006-12-10 18:31 ` Serge Aleynikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0612100933550.545@home.oyster.ru \
--to=av1474@comtv.ru \
--cc=bhurt@spnz.org \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).