caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Jambon <martin_jambon@emailuser.net>
To: Joel Reymont <joelr1@gmail.com>
Cc: Jacques GARRIGUE <garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp>,
	jtbryant@valdosta.edu, caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] camlp4 and class introspection
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:11:11 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706111156290.14234@martin.ec.wink.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A466AABB-AE76-4E11-B533-6740807A3C70@gmail.com>

On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Joel Reymont wrote:

>
> On Jun 11, 2007, at 1:58 AM, Jacques GARRIGUE wrote:
>
>> Then you can use camlp4 to parse the .mli and generate the
>> registration code to be included in the .ml file.
>
> Right. I want to parse the class definition to extract instance variable 
> types and method signatures. Then I can use this information to create calls 
> to the Objective-C runtime.
>
> If there's an instance variable of type "float outlet", for example, then 
> I'll know to strip outlet from OCaml code and to tell ObjC that it's an 
> outlet. The whole purpose is to be able to define ObjC classes in OCaml while 
> automatically creating the glue and bridging code.

I see 2 main options:
- parse type definitions in standard OCaml syntax (what Jacques 
suggested): you can use an external 
preprocessor, the program can be compiled independently from camlp4, and 
you would discard type definitions that can't be converted to Objective-C. 
Another advantage is that you could use other similar preprocessors to 
generate code for other purposes.
- introduce a special kind of type definitions (like Yaron suggested), so 
that only these would generate Objective-C code. The big advantage is that 
you could add options. For example, if an OCaml type has 2 equivalents in 
Objective-C, you could add an annotation to choose which one to use.
It makes OCaml-like type definitions, which usually do not cover all 
possible type definitions and are not compatible with standard OCaml.



Martin


  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-11 10:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-09 22:59 Joel Reymont
2007-06-10  0:14 ` [Caml-list] " Jonathan Bryant
2007-06-10 12:30   ` Joel Reymont
2007-06-10 20:02     ` Yaron Minsky
2007-06-10 21:18       ` Joel Reymont
2007-06-10 22:07         ` Yaron Minsky
2007-06-11  0:58     ` Jacques GARRIGUE
2007-06-11  8:05       ` Joel Reymont
2007-06-11 10:11         ` Martin Jambon [this message]
2007-06-11 10:16           ` Joel Reymont
2007-06-11 11:36             ` Martin Jambon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0706111156290.14234@martin.ec.wink.com \
    --to=martin_jambon@emailuser.net \
    --cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
    --cc=garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp \
    --cc=joelr1@gmail.com \
    --cc=jtbryant@valdosta.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).