From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910C8BBC1 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:53:41 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmMBALKK10fAXQInh2dsb2JhbACQcgEBAQgKKZZ+ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,488,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="23678962" Received: from concorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.39]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 12 Mar 2008 15:53:41 +0100 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m2CEreLw014986 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:53:41 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: As4AALKK10dCbwQcnmdsb2JhbACQcgEBAQEBBgQGBwoYln4 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,488,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="9337556" Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 12 Mar 2008 15:53:40 +0100 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FDA8C3B93; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:53:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:53:39 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: HVQrU3AH+4YFLjMMK2HacYaku+jcyDD7W9Assxer3J0D 1205333618 Received: from [192.168.1.10] (ALyon-157-1-72-213.w81-251.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.251.159.213]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 522B816B5A; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:53:38 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:52:56 +0100 (CET) From: Martin Jambon X-X-Sender: martin@martin.ec.wink.com To: Vincent Hanquez Cc: Sylvain Le Gall , caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: what's in the future for ocamlbuild? In-Reply-To: <20080312143831.GA1893@snarc.org> Message-ID: References: <1ef034530803112157m3bb804f4w6723252a84c2ec62@mail.gmail.com> <20080312115940.GA16816@capsaicin.mamane.lu> <20080312120506.GA1078@snarc.org> <20080312143831.GA1893@snarc.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 47D7EE74.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; ens-lyon:01 authoring:98 gpl:01 gpl:01 wrote:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 jambon:01 jambon:01 argument:02 off-topic:02 btw:03 gnu:03 logic:04 wed:06 On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Vincent Hanquez wrote: > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 02:22:26PM +0000, Sylvain Le Gall wrote: >> Most of the GPL stuff are copyright FSF, which is indeed not legal in >> France. Following what you say, almost the full GNU tools suite is not >> legal in France > > what kind of logic is that ? > copyright assignment can be legal in others countries [1], that's > doesn't means the software becomes illegal when use in France. > > btw not most GPL stuff are copyrighted FSF. > I certainly don't agree with this kind of pratice and it won't happen on > any software i'm "authoring". > > [1]: maybe in france too IANAL, i just saw the argument about it a couple of > time on this same mailing list. Ahem. You're going off-topic... Martin -- http://wink.com/profile/mjambon http://martin.jambon.free.fr