From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id UAA25486; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 20:46:21 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA24434 for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 20:46:20 +0100 (MET) Received: from nef.ens.fr (nef.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g2KJkJP25342 for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 20:46:19 +0100 (MET) Received: from clipper.ens.fr (clipper-gw.ens.fr [129.199.1.22]) by nef.ens.fr (8.10.1/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id g2KJkIp39795 ; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 20:46:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (frisch@localhost) by clipper.ens.fr (8.9.2/jb-1.1) id UAA00602 ; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 20:46:18 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 20:46:18 +0100 (MET) From: Alain Frisch To: Gerd Stolpmann cc: Caml list Subject: Re: [Caml-list] The DLL-hell of O'Caml In-Reply-To: <3C989156.6010906@gerd-stolpmann.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Gerd Stolpmann wrote: > Oh, sorry, I was here on the wrong track. Adding a function does not > break functor applications. Is there any case where module signatures > must exactly match? I'm not sure this answer the question, but for instance, if you have: a.ml empty b.ml: let f x = x +. 1. include A b.mli: val f: float -> float then you are not allowed to add: let f x = x + 1 to a.ml -- Alain ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners