caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alain.Frisch@ens.fr
To: Caml list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Type inference + optional parameters
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 10:08:06 +0200 (MET DST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.44.0309031007140.14812-100000@clipper.ens.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030903110813O.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp>

On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Jacques Garrigue wrote:

> From: Christoph Bauer <c_bauer@informatik.uni-kl.de>
>
> > ocamls type inference uses information of optionl arguments. This
> > results in a strange behaviour.
>
> Brian Rogoff already answered this one. Do you seriously expect a
> type-safe compiler to simply ignore the type of the default value :-)

I guess the original question is not that naive. It would be possible to
have a type system with an extension like your multimatch, to make the
type of the result of a function depend on the presence/absence of
optional argument.

With a crazy syntax to express conditional unification constraints, you
could write for instance:

do_with_opt_conv: ?conv:('a -> 'b  orelse 'b = 'a) -> 'a -> 'b

meaning that in the absence of the optional argument, the result type
must be unified with the argument type (there are more constraints
when the optional argument is not provided).

Does it make sense ?

-- Alain

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners


  reply	other threads:[~2003-09-05 13:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-02 16:20 Christoph Bauer
2003-09-02 17:06 ` brogoff
2003-09-03  2:08 ` Jacques Garrigue
2003-09-03  8:08   ` Alain.Frisch [this message]
2003-09-06  0:53     ` Jacques Garrigue
2003-09-03  9:56   ` Michal Moskal
     [not found] <m3fzjf825m.fsf@diebuntekuh.de>
2003-09-02 19:01 ` brogoff

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.SOL.4.44.0309031007140.14812-100000@clipper.ens.fr \
    --to=alain.frisch@ens.fr \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).