From: orbifx <fox@orbitalfox.eu>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: [Caml-list] Naming packages
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 23:15:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a65737c9-2073-457b-69fa-efb746062046@orbitalfox.eu> (raw)
Is there a consensus or a serious reason to favour dashes or underscores in package names?
reply other threads:[~2021-06-15 22:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a65737c9-2073-457b-69fa-efb746062046@orbitalfox.eu \
--to=fox@orbitalfox.eu \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).