From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jonathan.roewen@gmail.com>
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADFD4BCAB
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Fri, 27 May 2005 12:06:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.196])
	by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j4RA6AWM005481
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Fri, 27 May 2005 12:06:11 +0200
Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a36so436006rnf
        for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Fri, 27 May 2005 03:06:10 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition;
        b=CjJ6zq8tyTbnlBz7/T2ON487XQUw+8csHbYuu2oMeH5XRn9926x9jEdyDjdCiDI8vu3asnB2343IqWAiKIzDLlLVP0vS2UQmzvd1KblM9vDdatld+6zsywjcDAzaUfLSKsALXAZ75XrxJ89VoyfPnn2imbmxO6ynsn+mC7bZqO8=
Received: by 10.38.89.40 with SMTP id m40mr822951rnb;
        Fri, 27 May 2005 03:06:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.38.209.33 with HTTP; Fri, 27 May 2005 03:06:10 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <ad8cfe7e050527030652565b3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 22:06:10 +1200
From: Jonathan Roewen <jonathan.roewen@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Jonathan Roewen <jonathan.roewen@gmail.com>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: [Caml-list] infix functions
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 4296F112.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)!
X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 infix:01 infix:01 arbitrary:01 functions:01 functions:01 pervasive:01 modules:01 int:01 int:01 instances:02 complex:04 horrible:04 i'm:08 prefix:08 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP autolearn=disabled 
	version=3.0.2
X-Spam-Level: 

Hi,

I see some pervasive functions are infix, and I'm wondering if there's
any plan to support making any arbitrary infix functions?

For instance, the Int32 (etc) modules are horrible to use cause of the
prefix functions. These are perfect candidates for being infix. And
being an OS project, there are a lot of instances where we need the
extra precision, and having to do things like add some_int32
another_int32 complex. Especially when you have to throw in
bitshifting, AND and OR, and other magic.

Jonathan