From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jonathan.roewen@gmail.com>
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E768BCAF
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 11:51:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.197])
	by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j5H9p8BB014507
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 11:51:08 +0200
Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a36so280826rnf
        for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 02:51:08 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=U6lawKfAAHUM8GifVXK2yS6RUueeq+Gtu/ZNL0UgnuhGeioEsOxD+VVlN/27tsABnLzntBTacZ9mDFlChTyPRsCZsRIYlCUsKaRkxBx7xGjeACtDuX1hQVMlYXM/WC+nT4Z+JFXcnKstxjx2lkm1GBRcEcNc2dNLmSnwB1kY/7s=
Received: by 10.38.88.69 with SMTP id l69mr19140rnb;
        Fri, 17 Jun 2005 02:51:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.38.209.44 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 02:51:07 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <ad8cfe7e05061702512a6e4f0@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 21:51:07 +1200
From: Jonathan Roewen <jonathan.roewen@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Jonathan Roewen <jonathan.roewen@gmail.com>
To: Alex Baretta <alex@barettadeit.com>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Running bytecode...
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
In-Reply-To: <42B29C33.1010302@barettadeit.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <ad8cfe7e050617003372e61cee@mail.gmail.com>
	 <42B29C33.1010302@barettadeit.com>
X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 42B29D0C.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)!
X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 bytecode:01 ocaml:01 byte-code:01 dynlink:01 dynlink:01 bytecode:01 ocaml:01 ...:98 possibile:98 short:01 native:02 native:02 vanilla:03 desirable:03 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP autolearn=disabled 
	version=3.0.2
X-Spam-Level: 

> The short answer is you can't. It's a pity, but to the present day the
> vanilla Ocaml distribution does not support mixing native and byte-code.
> Also, it is not possibile to Dynlink native code, which is even more of
> a pity.

Well, dynlink with native code probably isn't desirable, as can't
really verify it.

How about embedding the bytecode interpreter in an ocaml native
program? How would one go about that?