From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4EA3BCAE for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 06:31:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.204]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j5T4VM8x005498 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 06:31:23 +0200 Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a36so1227350rnf for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 21:31:22 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=SKDsxm8+F2jzmmCscMbXkySqV+/kLpv6ccMtFlXcwsPA/6pgtXSQxGXXAYCNfr+q5Aq5VdrbXKgrXbyqahgSj19niTgNgMnjY96n9S1+1/mg/Hdn5v7cF2za9qNQ5ZpP3h3VoGWrgrwdyuP2tpWgzwvKqhgwF4IZWJd2vUyCOvY= Received: by 10.38.79.39 with SMTP id c39mr3097111rnb; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 21:31:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.209.44 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 21:31:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 16:31:22 +1200 From: Jonathan Roewen Reply-To: Jonathan Roewen To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: [Caml-list] Module system and multiple libraries Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 42C2241A.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 ocaml:01 modules:01 modules:01 guess:02 module:03 module:03 library:03 library:03 scoping:05 conflicting:05 namespace:06 collision:06 standard:07 standard:07 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: Hi, Does OCaml have any support for having modules of the same name in different libraries? If not, it should be seriously looked at. I guess something as simple as using the folder name as a base, and for multiple module names conflicting with the base library, unprefixed modules would be the standard library. Just that I want to create modules that will collide with names from other libraries/standard library, and I don't want to run into more namespace collision problems. The record scoping rules are painful enough. Jonathan