From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAC0BBB9A for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 09:14:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.196]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jAF8EL3V000788 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 09:14:21 +0100 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so1339563nzo for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 00:14:20 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=N5xRy23sXU1TEzCtQemQnjabZVTWnMKBNHknT7vvTP9DcCEujAj2YoFOiKL+O6wcxxBLJ+P6gOfqF5a2sYiUHuCx1iufIFwe2Euwn9Ja2gvTaEqpiuP8x19cxjJZY5tXkDQthKAfWLWj5jpqkNIqFEEAx+RcRFezli/DhQhq6OE= Received: by 10.64.208.4 with SMTP id f4mr6406615qbg; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 00:14:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.10.5 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 00:14:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 21:14:20 +1300 From: Jonathan Roewen To: Jonathan Roewen Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocamlc -output-obj problems Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1132028623.11813.99.camel@rosella> X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 437998DD.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 ocamlc:01 -output-obj:01 char:01 argv:01 char:01 argv:01 ocaml:01 fault:04 fault:04 emails:92 i'm:08 gmail:09 doesn't:12 problems:13 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 It's all my fault. It's always all my fault ;D char **argv =3D ... =3D> char *argv[] =3D ... that one simple change fixed it. god-damn it all ;-) I'm glad ocaml doesn't have inconsistencies like this... Sorry for all these emails... Jonathan