From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 906F8BB9C for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 05:38:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.203]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jBL4c7nG014640 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 05:38:08 +0100 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i28so58616nzi for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 20:38:07 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jmn5LyQJaMjX8x61m1GOJmvzTE6vT4F1zQ2wK12OZ6loQtcJa/5+ihBF5rZOhgA6VpklT/JOmR8ZRIHHZaRyM2z8BHsJYDjvmATaa//Ow8YSfow0o0BGTib+CSVldQEvZmlmxLMbRPjGohanctmlm2Hi7ksKRVyoJbMQePp6ulg= Received: by 10.64.195.20 with SMTP id s20mr198800qbf; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 20:38:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.22.12 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 20:38:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:38:07 +1300 From: Jonathan Roewen To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] printast.ml:428 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 43A8DC2F.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 printast:01 printf:01 ppf:01 printf:01 precise:07 cases:08 gmail:09 instance:09 question:11 using:15 use:16 format:18 why:22 jonathan:23 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 > Got a tiny question: why is this line using printf, where the rest of > the cases use the ppf instance? (Format.printf to be precise). Jonathan