From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C8AABB81 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 10:02:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.199]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k1492Tdm012722 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 10:02:30 +0100 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 50so772848wri for ; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 01:02:29 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=gz+rwvrbGyYMg6rgPrsRy+YpQ3Duvzv+HJwu7HNrH77ea9srjbvsKVd/BOCjwSxYltm/ZbBKpcRUuX0PAIjbbcOexuaxZQNzjMn5ITqvX6wYFqKU+OP/MqbRp/1me0o0DWEx1gcSteOEAUXopglwrcMkxyrzHOpKmi1xJF714Yg= Received: by 10.64.242.11 with SMTP id p11mr5032qbh; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 01:02:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.10.15 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 01:02:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 22:02:29 +1300 From: Jonathan Roewen To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: [Caml-list] Asmdynlink: quick question MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 43E46DA5.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 asmdynlink:01 asmdynlink:01 runtime:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 slower:01 implement:05 interpreter:06 interpreter:06 gmail:09 question:11 does:14 that:22 why:22 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 Hi, Does asmdynlink implement the interpreter part of the runtime in ocaml? And is that why it is reportedly much slower than the normal ocaml interpreter in C? Jonathan