From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F744BB83 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 06:00:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.192]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5N40tfu002713 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 06:00:56 +0200 Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i28so652593nzi for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 21:00:55 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=QyGFyfF67mQre6VR6MMtgQUJOB090IVPr1HWARd4MYCHdz+tZPc2wBK5lk1VKPoE4svh25wz5UoqN0+fAmSSpv4dzoTZ/ONUunC54Ofo3lElDiiXVcgEu5WD+k8YhPiuBkAuOvErgMgYyboE5XY7cuCWSuQgE9caqhws/GfAvHU= Received: by 10.36.227.27 with SMTP id z27mr3132829nzg; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 21:00:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.133.5 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 21:00:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 21:00:54 -0700 From: "Nathaniel Gray" To: "Caml Mailing List" Subject: New camlp4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 449B6777.002 on nez-perce : j-chkmail score : X : 0/20 1 X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 449B6777.002 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; camlp:01 camlp:01 caltech:02 caltech:02 beta:04 beta:04 inria:06 anybody:07 edu:08 i'm:08 i'm:08 wondering:09 gray:90 gray:90 recall:10 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 I'm about to start a new project using camlp4 and I'm wondering whether to use the "beta" updated version of camlp4 [1] or the version that comes with 3.09. If the beta version is truly going to become the official version of camlp4 in the future then I'll go that way, but I don't recall seeing any official word to that effect. Can anybody clear this up or make a recommendation? Thanks, -Nathan [1] http://gallium.inria.fr/~pouillar/camlp4-changes.html -- >>>-- Nathaniel Gray -- Caltech Computer Science ------> >>>-- Mojave Project -- http://mojave.cs.caltech.edu -->