* New camlp4
@ 2006-06-23 4:00 Nathaniel Gray
2006-06-23 8:49 ` [Caml-list] " Nicolas Pouillard
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nathaniel Gray @ 2006-06-23 4:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Caml Mailing List
I'm about to start a new project using camlp4 and I'm wondering
whether to use the "beta" updated version of camlp4 [1] or the version
that comes with 3.09. If the beta version is truly going to become
the official version of camlp4 in the future then I'll go that way,
but I don't recall seeing any official word to that effect.
Can anybody clear this up or make a recommendation?
Thanks,
-Nathan
[1] http://gallium.inria.fr/~pouillar/camlp4-changes.html
--
>>>-- Nathaniel Gray -- Caltech Computer Science ------>
>>>-- Mojave Project -- http://mojave.cs.caltech.edu -->
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] New camlp4
2006-06-23 4:00 New camlp4 Nathaniel Gray
@ 2006-06-23 8:49 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2006-06-26 22:21 ` Nathaniel Gray
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Pouillard @ 2006-06-23 8:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nathaniel Gray; +Cc: Caml Mailing List
On 6/23/06, Nathaniel Gray <n8gray@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm about to start a new project using camlp4 and I'm wondering
> whether to use the "beta" updated version of camlp4 [1] or the version
> that comes with 3.09. If the beta version is truly going to become
> the official version of camlp4 in the future then I'll go that way,
> but I don't recall seeing any official word to that effect.
>
> Can anybody clear this up or make a recommendation?
>
The integration in the official CVS repository is imminent, just a few
days to wait :)
--
Nicolas Pouillard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] New camlp4
2006-06-23 8:49 ` [Caml-list] " Nicolas Pouillard
@ 2006-06-26 22:21 ` Nathaniel Gray
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nathaniel Gray @ 2006-06-26 22:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nicolas Pouillard; +Cc: Caml Mailing List
On 6/23/06, Nicolas Pouillard <nicolas.pouillard@inria.fr> wrote:
> On 6/23/06, Nathaniel Gray <n8gray@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm about to start a new project using camlp4 and I'm wondering
> > whether to use the "beta" updated version of camlp4 [1] or the version
> > that comes with 3.09. If the beta version is truly going to become
> > the official version of camlp4 in the future then I'll go that way,
> > but I don't recall seeing any official word to that effect.
> >
> > Can anybody clear this up or make a recommendation?
> >
>
> The integration in the official CVS repository is imminent, just a few
> days to wait :)
Great! Thanks!
--
>>>-- Nathaniel Gray -- Caltech Computer Science ------>
>>>-- Mojave Project -- http://mojave.cs.caltech.edu -->
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-06-26 22:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-06-23 4:00 New camlp4 Nathaniel Gray
2006-06-23 8:49 ` [Caml-list] " Nicolas Pouillard
2006-06-26 22:21 ` Nathaniel Gray
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).