From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4D81BC50 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:47:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.228]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7LMl7ML025000 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:47:08 +0200 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s6so1823352wxc for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:47:07 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=AFWkxIp64mOCevrl7z0TO24t24uOCbntjZ3cnYRBYm+MkwzNUJ89YxwSYzZMQKZERoWrDpCAudSShXXJRL2BUuIfnO//nV/THhA5QFoWNUCuOuQQcQp1lMru5xd4NUv3lANHSGLfY2txwzthNn6jP7DNWSsBMJCsXoELE4hCE3A= Received: by 10.90.73.3 with SMTP id v3mr363949aga; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:47:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.106.19 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:47:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:47:06 -0700 From: "Nathaniel Gray" To: "Caml Mailing List" Subject: Re: Select on channels (again) In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 44EA37EB.000 on nez-perce : j-chkmail score : X : 0/20 1 X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 44EA37EB.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; reimplement:01 buffered:01 ocaml:01 cheers:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 dev:01 dev:01 caml:02 caml:02 caltech:05 caltech:05 channel:05 inria:06 inria:06 Tap... tap... Hello? Is this thing on? On 8/14/06, Nathaniel Gray wrote: > Like others before me, I'm hitting the frustrating limitation that > it's impossible to select on a channel. This limitation forces one to > reimplement buffered IO in many situations where using channels would > otherwise be easy and sensible. There has been discussion on this > list in the past about this limitation[1], and there have been two > requests filed in mantis for this feature[2,3], but the ocaml dev team > has been silent on the matter. Is this feature objectionable to the > dev team or is it just a case of "too much work, not enough time?" If > somebody was to submit a quality patch implementing the feature would > it be accepted? > > Cheers, > -n8 > > [1] > [2] > [3] > > -- > >>>-- Nathaniel Gray -- Caltech Computer Science ------> > >>>-- Mojave Project -- http://mojave.cs.caltech.edu --> > -- >>>-- Nathaniel Gray -- Caltech Computer Science ------> >>>-- Mojave Project -- http://mojave.cs.caltech.edu -->