caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Moskal <michal.moskal@gmail.com>
To: Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr>
Cc: "Will M. Farr" <farr@mit.edu>,
	shootout-list@lists.alioth.debian.org, caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Ocaml sums the harmonic series -- four ways, four benchmarks: floating point performance
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 16:49:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b323bb98050115074947dc200e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050115115519.GA11037@yquem.inria.fr>

On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:55:19 +0100, Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr> wrote:
> As others have mentioned, this strongly depends on the processor
> instruction set and even on the processor model.  My own benchmarks
> (with your Caml code) give the following results:
> 
> PPC G4 (Cube)   1 < 2 < 3 < 4 < 5   speed ratio = 1.5
> Xeon 2.8        3 < 4 < 1 = 2 < 5   speed ratio = 1.02
> Pentium 4 2.0   3 < 1 < 2 < 4 < 5   speed ratio = 1.2
> Athlon XP 1.4   4 < 5 < 3 < 1 < 2   speed ratio = 2.2

I tested it on Athlon 64 3000+ using both 32bit and 64bit compilers,
the results:

32bit: 4 = 5 < 3 < 1 = 2, speed ratio 2.2
64bit: 3 < 1 = 2 = 4 < 5, speed ratio 1.15

Difference between 64 and 32 bit version (best cases) is 1.30 (64 is faster).

All tests were performed using ocaml 3.07.

> The Athlon figures are *very* surprising.  It could be the case that
> this benchmark falls into a quirk of that (otherwise excellent :-)
> processor.

So I guess in 32 bit mode it remains the same on newer athlons.

-- 
: Michal Moskal :: http://nemerle.org/~malekith/ :: GCS !tv h e>+++ b++
: No, I will *not* fix your computer............ :: UL++++$ C++ E--- a?


  reply	other threads:[~2005-01-15 15:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-13 15:53 Will M. Farr
2005-01-13 17:29 ` [Caml-list] " John Prevost
2005-01-13 19:01   ` Will M. Farr
2005-01-13 20:24     ` John Prevost
2005-01-13 20:50       ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2005-01-13 21:32         ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2005-01-15 11:55 ` Xavier Leroy
2005-01-15 15:49   ` Michal Moskal [this message]
2005-01-15 17:01   ` [Caml-list] [FP performance] Ocaml sums the harmonic series Christophe TROESTLER
2005-01-15 17:13   ` [Caml-list] Ocaml sums the harmonic series -- four ways, four benchmarks: floating point performance Yaron Minsky
2005-01-23  2:27 ` Oliver Bandel
2005-01-23  6:07   ` Will M. Farr
2005-01-23 15:18     ` Oliver Bandel
2005-01-16  9:57 Philippe Lelédy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b323bb98050115074947dc200e@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=michal.moskal@gmail.com \
    --cc=Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr \
    --cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
    --cc=farr@mit.edu \
    --cc=shootout-list@lists.alioth.debian.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).