From: dmitry grebeniuk <gdsfh1@gmail.com>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: overbld -- OCaml / MinGW / Win32
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:30:16 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b364036a0909301330o4dc8141do59538ab5d856a3d9@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hello.
I have an OCaml / MinGW / Win32 build system
that I've described in the post
http://caml.inria.fr/pub/ml-archives/caml-list/2009/09/1e88034bf03350ad0488a20dce729f79.en.html
For now, it is a mercurial repository with http pull
access with url
http://gdsfh.dyndns.org:8000/
(so you can clone repository with
$ hg clone http://gdsfh.dyndns.org:8000/ overbld
command)
Some build/install documentation can be found
in files /INSTALL and /doc/mingw-msys-setup.txt.
The status is "it works for me", and I'm interested in
any patches, fixes, improvements and comments.
The license is not included in repo, so I'm stating
the license here. This project should be used only
for personal needs, without any distribution, and you
must accept this:
1. overbld scripts are distributed under gpl/bsd license.
2. you should not violate any "package"'s license
found at /src/package/orig/ directory,
3. nobody can distribute the default binary builds of
overbld, because overbld scripts build ocaml with
my own patches by default.
4. this "license" can be modified later, when it will
be possible to build binary packages that comply
every "package"'s license.
5. this "license" or the distribution will be fixed
as soon as possible, if it doesn't comply any of
packages' license.
6. when there will be any good enough license,
it will be placed in file /LICENSE in the overbld
repository, and this "license" (in the caml-list)
will lose any meaning.
Despite of the numerous patches, every
"packages"'s sources in this repository are not
modified, the sources can be found at
/src/package/orig.
The license is very far from the useful one, but I
don't know what the acceptable license could be
used here for this kind of project.
Repository hosting is not fast -- it's my own
home host, 256kbit/s outgoing only. I haven't found
any acceptable hosting for this kind of project.
freehg.org is buggy with heavy downtimes,
bitbucket.org won't host such a big repository,
google-code asks me for a license, and.. you
see, I don't know what a license there should be.
I haven't found any other good enough public
mercurial hosting. Any ideas?
next reply other threads:[~2009-09-30 20:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-30 20:30 dmitry grebeniuk [this message]
2009-09-30 23:36 ` [Caml-list] " Mykola Stryebkov
[not found] ` <20091001.104532.670395585433030105.Christophe.Troestler+ocaml@umons.ac.be>
2009-10-01 9:54 ` dmitry grebeniuk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b364036a0909301330o4dc8141do59538ab5d856a3d9@mail.gmail.com \
--to=gdsfh1@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).