From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,HTML_00_10,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96766BBC1 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:53:39 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjsFAJKPEEjAXQIm/2dsb2JhbACCMjilVYUH X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,705,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="25465258" Received: from discorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.38]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 24 Apr 2008 22:53:39 +0200 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m3OKrZkw009338 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:53:38 +0200 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnYFAA2QEEjRVcisc2dsb2JhbACCMjiOagEMAwQECQ8FljmFBw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,705,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="10031920" Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.172]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 24 Apr 2008 22:53:38 +0200 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 26so3442367wfd.0 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 13:53:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=4h78iF+tYuXVuf+1J9I2frjkrP6w5AmVUTWdbvJZncQ=; b=HKDhAJSHpgoBkBDGNO0B6V7dNzWQM1wlOYybNJW7gaZmh1dKq33hq7lgt/f0fac1zOj6kYzaabZiGZGHB05Fc4mfS/6IE9q0ac6gxHOhP/rNFdObM+vUBLHf74akkESB8z7e9yXN4E8CM6KITxLcCHUm1m/gGSq17tgAveUZfLg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=C8WXUfHT9tS0XrTNGDdMgdxyQfK4kNwg3i5BgoCMp0q9rLRrWTUysjbX1jpU71CmU8CsCWplCJeLvbxbEMbr3ucYskjFaRKPuq9PDMoOBg4G8DdtrH9LH5fSLcaxT9kcl/nJNTXo0iXbKcHoeJrAgpcXynysKiS7B1dnXlAY2WE= Received: by 10.142.214.5 with SMTP id m5mr670463wfg.229.1209070416915; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 13:53:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.153.9 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 13:53:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:53:36 +0200 From: "Berke Durak" To: "Jon Harrop" Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [OSR] Standard syntax extensions ? Cc: caml-list In-Reply-To: <200804241802.19074.jon@ffconsultancy.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2517_4721924.1209070416905" References: <1209052182.6180.35.camel@Blefuscu> <200804241802.19074.jon@ffconsultancy.com> X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 4810F34F.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; berke:01 durak:01 berke:01 durak:01 syntax:01 compiler:01 cmo:01 cmi:01 cmxa:01 compiler:01 cmo:01 cmi:01 cmxa:01 caml-list:01 functions:01 X-Attachments: cset="UTF-8" cset="UTF-8" ------=_Part_2517_4721924.1209070416905 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline We absolutely need a standard serialization solution. I'm thinking of Sexplib of course but it could be another one. The reason it must be standard is that it's difficult to provide serialization/deserialization functions outside the imlementation. So Sexplib should be a standard extension, or better, it should be included in the compiler and used for the .cmo/.cmi/.cmxa files. -- Berke Durak ------=_Part_2517_4721924.1209070416905 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline We absolutely need a standard serialization solution.

I'm thinking of Sexplib of course but it could be another one.  The reason it must be standard is that it's difficult to provide serialization/deserialization functions outside the imlementation.

So Sexplib should be a standard extension, or better, it should be included in the compiler and used for the .cmo/.cmi/.cmxa files.

--
Berke Durak

------=_Part_2517_4721924.1209070416905--