From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98CD1BC37 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:29:00 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgMBAIMHKkvRVd+/mWdsb2JhbACBWZBHiQM/AQEBAQEICwoHE6pvgTKFaohjAQIDBYQoBA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.47,414,1257116400"; d="scan'208";a="40103328" Received: from mail-iw0-f191.google.com ([209.85.223.191]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 17 Dec 2009 19:28:20 +0100 Received: by iwn29 with SMTP id 29so388753iwn.1 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:28:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=BGV3uoZW3MfjrSApNkwR+Z9Q7EM/gDCBabDJ08H5Z9g=; b=I60WOvRCRzT0l9baoMsJgydFH5Y+yf0+g3lKmrcSUkB4hnx5FGvTavbEUv824N1Bcw 1u2gBiAUApeTfD5HK7RLSBUrjLhlRR7co49gD/kQ0u0bhiA3huoObU5p59KLm70xJ4rs fOrcW1+WWAf8OsikD+ysQOLaCzSB2EBxWpPYw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Q32QF/DIByTCYV0CMkKMg1O/v+EOOejj+zUBFTLVAlm9VUNzk10SU4SUqEXoFVsGU0 ZUlmzAoEO1UV7QBKJECfeGezQ57un01yAUiwweZInvBf7vCdZTmBF+fzmxCoo39kuk1e 5wsZjTzvMB6LIKE2TUU6MKh+dbUNZL+14BfTQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.123.216 with SMTP id q24mr946350ibr.43.1261074499465; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:28:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:28:19 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: compiling OCaml program for supercomputer running SGI Propack 6? From: Dave Lewis To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64698e4937424047af0c956 X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 ocaml:01 compilation:01 compiler:01 compilation:01 compiler:01 ufb:98 ufb:98 compilers:01 compilers:01 compiling:02 binary:02 binary:02 fortran:02 fortran:02 --0016e64698e4937424047af0c956 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 [Apologies for duplication across mailing lists.] Hi - I'd like to run this OCaml program: http://www.cs.utah.edu/~hal/megam/ on the 3TB memory supercomputer described here http://www.ncsa.illinois.edu/UserInfo/Resources/Hardware/SGIAltix/Tec... It appears that the OS, SGI ProPack 6 http://www.sgi.com/products/software/linux/propack.html is a version of Linux, but the 64-bit Linux compilation we produced using the OCaml 3.10 compiler gives this error message: Exec format error. Binary file not executable. I'm not sure where to go from here. The compilers available for the machine are listed as: Intel 10.1: Fortran77/90/95 C C++ GNU: Fortran77 C C++ so if there were an OCaml to Fortran, C, or C++ translator we might be able to go that route. Anybody know of one? On the other hand, I know there's been some use of OCaml in scientific computing, so maybe someone has a better idea? Regards, Dave www.DavidDLewis.com --0016e64698e4937424047af0c956 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [Apologies for duplication across mailing lists.]

Hi - I'd like = to run this OCaml program:

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0http= ://www.cs.utah.edu/~hal/megam/

on the 3TB memory supercomputer described here

=A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0http:/= /www.ncsa.illinois.edu/UserInfo/Resources/Hardware/SGIAltix/Tec...

It appears that the OS, SGI ProPack 6

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0http://www.sgi.com/products/software= /linux/propack.html

is a version of Linux, but the 64-bit Linux compilation we produced=
using the OCaml 3.10 compiler gives this error message:

= =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Exec format error. Binary file not executable.

I= 'm not sure where to go from here. =A0 The compilers available for the =
machine are listed as:

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Intel 10.1: Fortran77/90= /95 C C++
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0GNU: Fortran77 C C++

so if there = were an OCaml to Fortran, C, or C++ translator we might be
able to go = that route. =A0Anybody know of one? =A0On the other hand, I
know there's been some use of OCaml in scientific computing, so maybe =
someone has a better idea?

Regards, Dave
www.DavidDLewis.com

--0016e64698e4937424047af0c956--