caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jim Miller" <gordon.j.miller@gmail.com>
To: skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Interactive technical computing
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 22:36:18 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <beed19130703071936h4f060da5l33c3ff6cab5066d1@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1173324431.12230.94.camel@rosella.wigram>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1930 bytes --]

>From a marketing perspective a price point in the 100s is definitely more
reasonable than the thousands, obviously :-)

What's I think is the interesting point about this discussion is "What are
the hurdles toward acceptance of any new language, scripting or not, into a
given community?"  Obviously OCAML and the ML languages have deeply
penetrated some markets but haven't even dented others.  There have been
lots of papers, studies, and discussion written on this (
lambda-the-ultimate.org has many of them archived) so that's probably
something for a different thread to be read wearing flame-retardant
underthings.

Professionally I'm in a community that could deeply benefit from the type of
language that would allow for scripting, data analysis, etc, that could then
be directly compiled into tight executable code.  While the barriers to
entry to that market could be high, I'm in a position where I could see
selling it.  I could actually get really excited about this.

Probably something to take off list if this is something to pursue

On 3/7/07, skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 22:19 -0500, Jim Miller wrote:
> > Ah, I misunderstood ...
> >
> > I would say that with the researchers I know of and work with, the
> > answer would be no.  $5K these days is a lot of money for most of the
> > scientists I'm working with, to the point that they're actually using
> > Octave and R (free) and moving away from buying their analysis
> > packages.
>
> So how about $500? I just picked a random number out of the air.
>
> Don't forget .. the general framework Harrop describes isn't
> restricted to the science market, certainly not just atmospherics.
>
> Although with the current hype about global warming, atmospheric
> modelling might get additional funds pumped in .. :)
>
> --
> John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
> Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2441 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-08  3:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-08  1:13 Jon Harrop
2007-03-08  1:49 ` [Caml-list] " Jim Miller
2007-03-08  2:52   ` skaller
2007-03-08  3:00     ` Jim Miller
2007-03-08  3:10       ` skaller
     [not found]         ` <beed19130703071919g1f537f59o93ce06871fba8f3a@mail.gmail.com>
2007-03-08  3:27           ` skaller
2007-03-08  3:36             ` Jim Miller [this message]
2007-03-08 21:16               ` Richard Jones
     [not found]                 ` <45F10E90.5000707@laposte.net>
2007-03-09  7:43                   ` Matthieu Dubuget
2007-03-10 14:58                     ` Richard Jones
2007-03-08 12:22             ` Gerd Stolpmann
2007-03-08 14:24               ` Christophe TROESTLER
2007-03-08 19:34                 ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-08 20:34                   ` Christophe TROESTLER
2007-03-09 10:22                     ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-09 10:45                       ` Christophe TROESTLER
2007-03-08  2:12 ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2007-03-08 12:41   ` [Caml-list] F# Jon Harrop
2007-03-08 11:12 ` [Caml-list] Interactive technical computing Andrej Bauer
2007-03-08 11:59 ` Vu Ngoc San
2007-03-08 12:43   ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-08 21:28     ` Vu Ngoc San
2007-03-09  0:14       ` skaller
2007-03-08 21:26 Robert Fischer
2007-03-09  0:04 ` skaller
2007-03-09 10:06   ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-09 10:25 ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-10 14:55 ` Richard Jones
2007-03-10 22:07   ` Michael Vanier
2007-03-29  0:33     ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-29  8:41       ` Joel Reymont
2007-03-30 11:31         ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-09 13:33 Robert Fischer
2007-03-09 13:49 ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-09 13:54 ` skaller
2007-03-09 14:13 Robert Fischer
2007-03-09 15:21 ` skaller
2007-03-09 17:26 ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-09 18:50 ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-09 14:21 Robert Fischer
2007-03-09 15:35 Robert Fischer
2007-03-09 17:41 Robert Fischer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=beed19130703071936h4f060da5l33c3ff6cab5066d1@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=gordon.j.miller@gmail.com \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=skaller@users.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).