From: Tom <tom.primozic@gmail.com>
To: "David Teller" <David.Teller@ens-lyon.org>
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Feature request : Tuples vs. records
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 20:45:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c1490a380702221145n453c3ed8w45f144a358a2a6b1@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45DDA0BF.2000807@ens-lyon.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 591 bytes --]
On 22/02/07, David Teller <David.Teller@ens-lyon.org> wrote:
>
>
> Now, unless I'm mistaken, OCaml's design is mostly towards structural
> typing. Usually, when one wants nominal typing, one resorts to abstract
> types safely hidden in modules. From this point of view, nominal typing
> of records is therefore somewhat surprising.
>
>
In general, there is a problem with structural (sub)typing... Although it
seems better and in all ways superior to nominal (sub)typing from the
theoretical point of view, practically, it is... slow. (At least when
compared to nominal (sub)typing).
- Tom
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 899 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-22 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-22 10:25 David Teller
2007-02-22 10:42 ` [Caml-list] " Andrej Bauer
2007-02-22 12:41 ` skaller
2007-02-22 13:55 ` David Teller
2007-02-22 15:44 ` Jon Harrop
2007-02-22 19:45 ` Tom [this message]
2007-02-22 23:26 ` skaller
2007-02-22 15:28 ` Andreas Rossberg
2007-02-22 15:57 ` Till Varoquaux
[not found] ` <45DDC424.2020804@ens-lyon.org>
2007-02-22 16:57 ` Till Varoquaux
2007-02-22 17:19 ` brogoff
2007-02-22 15:34 Frederic GAVA
2007-02-22 16:16 ` David Teller
2007-02-23 1:39 ` Jacques Garrigue
2007-02-23 13:34 ` Richard Jones
2007-02-23 13:43 ` Till Varoquaux
2007-02-23 14:14 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2007-02-23 1:45 ` Jon Harrop
2007-02-23 16:32 ` Lukasz Stafiniak
2007-02-24 13:43 ` Lukasz Stafiniak
2007-02-24 15:50 ` Brian Hurt
2007-02-24 18:14 ` skaller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c1490a380702221145n453c3ed8w45f144a358a2a6b1@mail.gmail.com \
--to=tom.primozic@gmail.com \
--cc=David.Teller@ens-lyon.org \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).