From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jake.donham@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,
	SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05001BBAF
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Fri,  8 Aug 2008 18:28:36 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8AAGgRnEhIDtyZlGdsb2JhbACRAD4BAQEBCQMKBxEDlGyFeQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.31,328,1215381600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="28065232"
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.153])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 08 Aug 2008 18:28:06 +0200
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l27so903349fgb.43
        for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 09:28:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender
         :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references
         :x-google-sender-auth;
        bh=fDlggfK+/6p3QI3nn+UtU8YGFzjzAOJ1FuDzzIlwHjg=;
        b=Fhzii15w24HAiPeQdsnlDvPx9BFkddzvNC4fh3yeFFjagkvdCV0qEpPcU5rk++Iiyx
         rxyFa+QUdMM+tkUXL58hy3FQWmY6GCSsGY01UrLIqE7LwoFbIi35jq5egBWbxUjckTqH
         kPTZF6b4Q2yn+2GE8jbyuKJrnr+dy8udq6TX0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
         :references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=fzfxfPVseMbiBDS/XGFugdzR34y9YCI9Ao/eeisQ+2qFbf9GzCJKk48y00gCUEQyD6
         us+utxy1j/VTg0ffpNKNPsvHUMnH0RkvGu+g7FYeThCw5fKEwGzJYAUKkjdnePSfpQ2f
         zzh9ZFC84JsKe4RKRGhxt4NjRSrbO5aCDVjTg=
Received: by 10.187.224.14 with SMTP id b14mr198367far.4.1218212885426;
        Fri, 08 Aug 2008 09:28:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.187.207.14 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Aug 2008 09:28:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <c7e4e9f0808080928p4fc2be42te59a7855d13f5d23@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 09:28:05 -0700
From: "Jake Donham" <jake@donham.org>
Sender: jake.donham@gmail.com
To: "Alain Frisch" <alain@frisch.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] linking the same module more than once
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
In-Reply-To: <489BE3F8.7070207@frisch.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <c7e4e9f0808071623r61cad81cya5fd55f57352a720@mail.gmail.com>
	 <489BE3F8.7070207@frisch.fr>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6ea5bc7f266245ba
X-Spam: no; 0.00; frisch:01 frisch:01 bytecode:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 alain:01 alain:01 modules:02 linking:02 linking:02 module:03 thu:05 accident:93 linker:07 aug:10 

On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 11:13 PM, Alain Frisch <alain@frisch.fr> wrote:
> You should really avoid linking two modules with the same name.

Yes, I agree vehemently :). I would like the bytecode linker to help
me out by (at least) warning me when I do it by accident.

Jake