From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST, SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E0CDBB84 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 10:55:50 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AncBAArGe0nRVdsSmGdsb2JhbACTPj8BAQEBAQgJDAcRp2mNLQEDAQOFSIMj X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.37,321,1231110000"; d="scan'208";a="20126378" Received: from mail-ew0-f18.google.com ([209.85.219.18]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 25 Jan 2009 10:55:50 +0100 Received: by ewy11 with SMTP id 11so597981ewy.9 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 01:55:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aoBuAnF129EAZlcIfSHr9ipFUBQFuUIbRaQB9fARCJ0=; b=L5a8mZYAJhkgfnIrBTjHadowUVHpGYm/3+qxqFtnF4YljRrqZgcXsKvdgHAzU8eQL7 uaGVOVDx3oHjiGbDQtjIpJx/tDgB230jKkEt4sQSYLXe2sIPKZs3pm0fVmgWMF5qT11m mmjSYvssl+Slq8AMaJ+sNSCzhDmrpWoyiGEE4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=adYMNwdpmxEm6eOv5Zvigch/aTbejjmjqMBvWPIFU8fif4VkUcyYI3xLcVkM7AlIuC 8gJQbYBrlS2Z0Shy2zwx1aCZKor+rwfE4zd5rRLbhuoF58pR4dLAKfvsA0dHvdOmOdgg kEOdMsgPShMm0bC1YKtJ2vIwgabTvMQm1aIp4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: mikkelfj@gmail.com Received: by 10.210.43.11 with SMTP id q11mr1540029ebq.155.1232877349639; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 01:55:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20090125094912.GA8018@annexia.org> References: <20090125094912.GA8018@annexia.org> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 10:55:49 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 844028fa3e32b9fb Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Caml-list] camlp4 compilation model From: =?UTF-8?Q?Mikkel_Fahn=C3=B8e_J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Richard Jones Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam: no; 0.00; camlp:01 compilation:01 model:01 mikkel:01 rgensen:01 mikkel:01 0100,:01 rgensen:01 camlp:01 syntax:01 syntax:01 2009:98 2009:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 2009/1/25 Richard Jones : > On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 09:15:43PM +0100, Mikkel Fahn=C3=B8e J=C3=B8rgens= en wrote: >> It seems that an enduser program can link with a camlp4 enhanced >> library and magically have its syntax extended without adding camlp4 >> to the build process (once the library has been built). For example >> the bitstring library introduces the bitmatch syntax. > > No, this isn't so, at least not in bitstring. > OK, thank you both for clarifying this. Mikkel