From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB5ABB83 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 10:49:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5N8neKb017677 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 10:49:41 +0200 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j3so852218ugf for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 01:49:40 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=n/RSbdDsgKLFpmcjEHLjf1Gqbvi9zrtkpaRcV076T+8IXx8HxPKjhBLFkXobbhXMaZ/5H8VmCBh+6rrp3Wcn6T7WZAvx4cWdH0FK1yX4Eo8j6EQDcUwspKLaxPlB7Q7L3ZebK2frYYqcw07i3wtmZbUVZP6polW36+tSLOzex5Y= Received: by 10.78.117.10 with SMTP id p10mr1190365huc; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 01:49:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.13.17 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 01:49:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 10:49:40 +0200 From: "Nicolas Pouillard" Sender: nicolas.pouillard@gmail.com To: "Nathaniel Gray" Subject: Re: [Caml-list] New camlp4 Cc: "Caml Mailing List" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Google-Sender-Auth: 679945cd104d4f27 X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 449BAB24.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; camlp:01 camlp:01 cvs:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 nicolas:02 nicolas:02 repository:04 beta:04 beta:04 inria:06 anybody:07 i'm:08 i'm:08 wondering:09 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 On 6/23/06, Nathaniel Gray wrote: > I'm about to start a new project using camlp4 and I'm wondering > whether to use the "beta" updated version of camlp4 [1] or the version > that comes with 3.09. If the beta version is truly going to become > the official version of camlp4 in the future then I'll go that way, > but I don't recall seeing any official word to that effect. > > Can anybody clear this up or make a recommendation? > The integration in the official CVS repository is imminent, just a few days to wait :) -- Nicolas Pouillard