From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <circularfunc@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.8 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,SPF_NEUTRAL 
	autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DD23BBB7
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:49:02 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgEBAJJ1okhA6bjilGdsb2JhbACROD4BAQEBCQMKBxEDnR2HRwEC
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.32,201,1217800800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="28193315"
Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.226])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 13 Aug 2008 14:48:46 +0200
Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c55so2434681wra.11
        for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 05:48:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
         :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
         :content-disposition;
        bh=A3qlc6HyLFeres7HDjbT91p4SEhu8wle6derMkpo6hs=;
        b=IDfym0gBzvDFt3Qk39TEHectOUvNBoBNL/ZE/AWsTr9oEk2gwyRECM/ao6T29n6OUk
         4Bohm3a5SxdBziZcoPs4ZpTJuNKR/6VvfquntPVbIVTjwHj9VwcbOLPocp92J/ucuUa8
         XfMhdkSsWf/KXM2h8SDLSTzYVQj7sLJ2xfJ50=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition;
        b=yDtpqCOALGWUci0ec7zDx7Vl7ZbYdjVb1WVko+xvEvFLiUA6yAhgxxlyfLxcA9inOA
         zd6/tTwItqW2TWKsJJ0mN0S16B38r7yvbgNTlU3YRdn1+cG8UgHLh80PFOTRv1J54VKY
         oPoYI+aFVKnRVV5yLHg7GLj1KQoKv35nogspE=
Received: by 10.90.84.2 with SMTP id h2mr7216526agb.93.1218631725225;
        Wed, 13 Aug 2008 05:48:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.90.113.9 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 05:48:45 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <d5f6b0140808130548g2492a094v843ed15e1c83adae@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:48:45 +0200
From: "circ ular" <circularfunc@gmail.com>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Haskell vs OCaml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam: no; 0.00; haskell:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 haskell:01 comparing:11 circ:13 advantages:16 when:22 what:24 com:74 the:27 are:33 gmail:48 

What are the advantages/disadvantages when comparing OCaml to Haskell?