caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ludovic Coquelle" <lcoquelle@gmail.com>
To: Andrej.Bauer@andrej.com
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] invoke function from its name as string
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:10:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d6c7b34d0803130010x48c71286n1523a64aa384c5ad@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47D8CE92.2020009@fmf.uni-lj.si>

On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Andrej Bauer
<Andrej.Bauer@fmf.uni-lj.si> wrote:
> Ludovic Coquelle wrote:
>  > (re-send as it seems it didn't go through)
>
>  It did.

Sorry for the double post (gmail probably filtered the mail I sent to list).

>  > First, hello everyone as it is my first message to this list ;)
>  >
>  >  I'm trying to solve this problem:
>  >  I have a module name and function name in string variables,
>  >  and I would like to call this function, like :
>  >  let mod = "MyMod" in
>  >  let fn = "my_fun" in
>  >  what_come_here mod fn
>  >
>  >  Can this problem be solved?
>
>  If you are new to ocaml then we can help you much better if you explain
>  what problem you are trying to solve. It looks like you are trying to
>  write in Ocaml something that is common in Python/perl/shell. There is
>  likely to be a different, better way of doing the same thing in Ocaml.
>
>  Best regards,
>
>  Andrej
>

Thanks for this answer.
Problem I'm trying to solve is the following:

I use 'make_suite' which is a program that do regex matching on source
code to extract a list of function that looks like OUnit tests; from
this list, it write an ocaml source code file which is a test case
that call all the previous functions found.
(see: http://skydeck.com/blog/programming/unit-test-in-ocaml-with-ounit/)

Now, instead of having a program which write a source file that I have
to compile and run, I would prefer if I can change 'make_suite' to
create the test case and run it directly.

Thus, I have a list of function's names as string and I would like a
list of functions.
Is this possible?
Is there a better way to achieve automatic test case construction?

PS: this is not a *real problem* to use an intermediate file; just
wanna learn if we can do without :)


  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-13  7:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-13  4:07 Ludovic Coquelle
2008-03-13  5:04 ` Ludovic Coquelle
2008-03-13  6:49   ` [Caml-list] " Andrej Bauer
2008-03-13  7:10     ` Ludovic Coquelle [this message]
2008-03-13 16:41       ` Andrej Bauer
2008-03-13 17:03         ` Andrew Gacek
2008-03-14  0:53           ` Ludovic Coquelle
2008-03-13  9:44 ` Berke Durak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d6c7b34d0803130010x48c71286n1523a64aa384c5ad@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=lcoquelle@gmail.com \
    --cc=Andrej.Bauer@andrej.com \
    --cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).