From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id WAA01790; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 22:03:04 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA01262 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 22:03:03 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.198]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6UK32SH009944 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 22:03:02 +0200 Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 74so107920rnk for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:03:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.2.75 with SMTP id 75mr95583rnb; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:03:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 16:03:01 -0400 From: John Prevost To: Ocaml Mailing List Subject: Re: [Caml-list] XEmacs or GNU Emacs? In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 410AA976.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; prevost:01 prevost:01 caml-list:01 caml:01 emacs:01 emacs:01 o'caml:02 gnu:05 gnu:05 modes:05 xemacs:06 john:09 actually:11 primarily:13 really:15 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk I use GNU emacs, myself--but as far as I can tell, it's primarily a matter of taste. If you're only interested in an editor-as-editor, either of those will work, as will any other editor, really. (I use a mix of gnu emacs and vi, actually.) There are also caml modes for windows-specific editors, if I recally right (take a look at the O'Caml Link Database.) Johm. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners